There are about 12,500 injuries per year in the National Basketball Association (Nba). In the lives of basketball players these injuries can be very harmful in many ways. One way that it can be harmful is when the players choose to ignore the injury and continue playing, this causes the injury to worsen. Also, doing this can not only affect them whilst they have the injury, but also in the future. When a player is injured they are benched. The amount for how long they are benched depends on how big the injury is, usually it’s from 6 to 12 weeks long, it can take longer if a player has been injured in that same spot before. Therefore, it is important to learn about the consequences of a basketball injury.
Mark C. Drakos published “Injury in the National Basketball Association” to analyze injuries that athletes experience. The statistics help organizations, management, and agents predict injuries for their basketball players. Mark used data from the National basketball association to determine the rates at which players pick up injuries. With the game being more physical in its advancements, the risks of getting injured during training and games continue to rise. Knowledge of the most vulnerable areas like ankles can help them devise new protection methods. Mark also notes that factors like age and height are not connected to these injuries for individuals, meaning the contact makes the player prone. He suggests that the information is very helpful for teams and players to be prepared for any accidental injuries that individuals may pick up.
The article is published on the sports health website, which gives information on keeping healthy and other medical issues in sports. The main audience of this information is basketball organizations, agents, management, athletes, and even fans. It assists them in injury prediction and possible preparedness before facing such issues. Athletes get insight into the areas that could bring serious injuries, hence ensuring they are more careful in the field. The same occurs for medical personnel for these athletes, who stay prepared for such injuries.
The tone of this article is calm, but educational. As seen on the publishing site, the article is about the health of basketball athletes. This means that such information makes them aware of the most serious injuries while on the field. This article shed light on the ankle as the most common joint injury these athletes face. This brings other issues like missing games and even the possibility of going through heavy medical treatments to eliminate the issue. The management of these players, especially the coach, is aware of such possibilities, which means he stays prepared while in the game.
The article focuses on the contribution of the evolving contact in basketball on the possibility of having injuries. It also outlines the most common parts that pick up injuries. In many cases, the ankles and knees are the most affected, causing several problems such as missing games and sustaining huge injuries.
The article specifies how the increased contact in basketball games has brought several injuries for them. The lower body is the most affected part, owing to the consistent runs and jumps made by the athletes. However, Mark issues that the physical conditions, including height and age, do not correlate with the injuries. It means that they are solely caused by contact during a physical activity game. The journal also states that the accuracy of the information cannot be given full credit due to several factors.
Douglas L Cerynik published “Outcomes of microfracture in professional basketball players” after examining the use of microfracture on basketball players. He used several players who had experienced the treatment, hence monitoring the results and effects of the treatment method. This includes checking their gaming habits before and after the surgery. According to Douglas, the process takes at least 30 weeks for full recovery so that players can get back on the pitch (Cerynik et al., 2009). After microfracture, the athletes can no longer return to their initial form. This means that their return has reduced performance per minute and efficiency. Douglas concludes that this treatment method does not give the players a chance to return to their form before the injury. The author is credible because he is a professional examiner, a physician.
The article was published in PubMed, one of the leading medicine sites, with information on medical issues. The primary audience in this journal is athletes, agents, organizations, and basketball fans. It gives them information on the possible outcome after an athlete goes through microfracture. They can assess the form that a player acquires on return to the pitch after the surgery.
The tone of this article is informative. The author examines basketball players and makes an analysis based on the examination and then lets everyone know. This proves that his tone is informative also because he specifically targets certain audiences to give them this information.
Douglas uses this platform to educate players and other audiences on the effects of microfracture on the pitch. Decisions on the kind of treatment to receive in such cases may be difficult for athletes. This is in light of their possibilities of continuing their careers and form. Twenty-four athletes are sufficient to give a good conclusion on the relevance of microfracture as a treatment method. The high probability is that the form of the basketball players cannot remain similar to that before the treatment. This allows them to make a wise decision on how to handle their injuries.
The genre of this source is a magazine article. It’s an article that is available to anyone that sits down and lays eyes on it. Also by being an article in a magazine it can interest other crowds and expand the knowledge of basketball players injuries and the prevention of them.
The journal aims at showing the change that microfracture makes on basketball players. The research done by Douglas insists that a result is always a diminishing form from individual players. It is also evident that other factors like age and experience do not correlate with the effect of this surgery on athletes. This means the ability to play after microfracture is solely dependent on it. Douglas has the conclusion that all these surgeries negatively affect athletes on the pitch after recovery.
“Prevention of Lower Extremity Injuries in Basketball” (2015, September 2) was Published as a sports health journal by Jeffrey B Taylor. The objective of this journal was to analyze the effectiveness of lower extremity injuries in basketball. Taylor conducted meta-analyses independently for every injury classification (ankle sprain, ACL rupture, and general injuries). The high rates of injuries are contributed to by the high numbers of participants in the game, with the injuries numbers being 7 and 10 per 1000 athletic exposure. Jeffer concludes that basketball players may benefit from preventative training to reduce the frequency of general lower limb injuries and ankle sprains, but not ACL injuries. Taylor is credible because he is a part of the sports health team.
The article was published in a sports health journal, a sports journal owned by Sage publishers. The article was published under the sports health sector, which focuses on sports-related issues. The main audience in the journal is people engaged and interested in sports. For this article, the main audience is basketballers, as the article gives more light on lower extremity injuries about ankle sprain and ACL injuries. The journal focuses more on basketballers and the injuries they accrue while participating in the sport.
The tone of this article was explanatory. The author gave many examples as to how doing certain exercises will help to prevent specific injuries. Being a sports health journal the purpose of this article was to shed some light on some of the lower extremity injuries that basketball athletes are exposed to and some of the effects of prophylactic interventions on ankle sprain in basketball players. Fixtures from that result from these said injuries. And from the study, it was revealed that there was a statistically significant reduction in ankle sprains in basketball players in prophylactic interventions.
The article is a sports health journal published by sage publishers. Sports health articles by sage publishers focus on issues related to sports and have empirical evidence from other research journals to support their arguments. These journals are available online and provide a deep understanding of a concept as it draws evidence from many related journals.
The journal looks into the significance of incorporating prophylactic interventions on ankle sprain in basketball players and the statistically significant results. Further, the author gives his stand on the effects of neuromuscular training on the incidence of ACL rupture in basketball; from examining three studies, Jeffer concludes that there was no statistical reduction in ACL injuries among basketball players. More so, Jeffer’s stance is that from the meta-analyses, “injury prevention programs are effective in reducing the incidence of general lower extremity injuries in basketball players.”
“It’s a Hard-Knock Life: Game Load, Fatigue, and Injury Risk in the National Basketball Association” by Melanie Lewis, PhD is about how there is a high rate of injuries a basketball player experiences and how this should be controlled. The author goes into detail about how no matter the size of the injury, big or small it can leave a huge impact on the player. She includes data of the size of the player and how likely it is for them to be injured as well as how many players participated in each season and how this affects the outcome of the game. Not only does the player’s injury have to heal physically, but the player has to heal mentally for the time that he hasn’t played and in all the other ways that the injury has had an impact on him.
In this case the audience can be athlete trainers, anyone that cares about basketball and the history of its players, and officials. Athlete trainers can be the audience because the author is talking about how to reduce the chances of injury so there can be some exercises that can help do this. To continue, the audience can be officials because the author might want to get this information to the highest of the authorities. To do this she is targeting anyone that likes or is interested in basketball. Also, this article has been published in colleges and is being shared at their libraries so it proves to be credible.
The tone of this article is very informative. The purpose of this source is to inform people analytically on the amount of injuries there are per year and how much it can and does destroy a player’s life. Not only this, but to also give importance to a player’s health. She talks about how instead of giving attention to the outcome of an injury attention should be given to the prevention of injuries. For example, more workload and fatigue give a higher risk to injuries. On top of that, the author talks about height playing a role in this. For example, shorter players tend to be more likely to get hurt.
This is a scholarly source. It’s a statistical article where the author cites everything in this article through the data. The author also tries to persuade the readers by giving examples of how many players should be playing in a season versus how many actually do because of all the injuries. Furthermore, this article was shared on many platforms which proves that it is a reliable source and she states where she got all her information from at the end.
The author makes her stance very clear on the action that should be taken involving basketball players injuries. She talks about taking action before rather than after the injury. She even clearly states, “The goal of my study was to make an empirical contribution to maintaining the health of athletes by identifying the important antecedents associated with injuries.” This shows the change in stats she wants to make in the nba. Lastly, the author gives importance to the player’s health the most out of everything and shows the readers that she thinks everyone should do this too and not just her.
To conclude, I used the same approach for each source since all of them were similar to each other. I talked about the data of the amount of basketball injuries that happen each year in the National Basketball Association and how they take effect in the lives of basketball players.
Furthermore, though the information used from the four sources were alike I talked about different things that I learned from each source. Such as, talking about how many players were injured based on a data chart in one and talking about the different effects of the players health in another.
Work Cited:
Source 1:
Source 2:
Source 3:
Source 4:
This entry is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International license.
